• Site Homepage
  • Blog Homepage
  • Forum Homepage
  • Categories
search shop

Text size: A A A

Guarantee

You are here: Home > Blog

November 14, 2009

Games Plea by 10-15 year old – can you help me?

My name is Robert.  I need your help!  I agree with my mum that there is a gap in the market for interactive games for kids my age.  Are you a games company or do you know someone who can write computer games?  I love games like Call of Duty modern warfare 2 but they are above my age range.   The language and the violence  is above the British censorship levels for my age and my parents won’t let me have it.  I need a game for under 16 that has the same cool stuff.  What I want in a game is:

1. First person shooter

2. Good graphics

3. Choices of weapons

4. Realistic action but not the language

5. Ability to play with friends on xbox live and others

6. Different map options

7. A campaign that makes sense and you work up the levels

8. Different levels of difficulty

9. Championship competitions

If you can help email labels4kids to my mum and I will help with more ideas!  I really need your help please gaming companies.  I can help with more ideas via my mum’s website and blog at www.labels4kids.com/blog  You can comment or let me know if you can help via that or via labels4kids at twitter.

Written by Robert with mum’s permission to publish!

November 13, 2009

Child of 3 charged over hitting friend

Here is an extract from what I was shocked to read today in the Daily Express:

“…A child of only 3, Jay Jones, was battered around the head and face by a three-year-old playmate as the children were left alone in a car. The attacker could not be prosecuted because he was too young, which meant Jay could not claim compensation for his injuries. According to the criminal justice system, a child must be over 10 to have criminal responsibility, but this case establishes a claimant merely has to prove a criminal act. David Kirwan, from Kirwans Solicitors, who represented the the victim, said: “It’s a landmark decision, there’s no previous precedent. It opens the floodgates and I’m quite sure there will be a lot of cases. Jay, of Wirral, Merseyside, was struck 11 times as his attacker continued to lash out even though he was screaming in pain and bleeding profusely. He was rescued when the other boy’s parents heard his shouts and noticed the car windscreen had been cracked, such was the ferocity of the assault…The doctor in the hospital had described our client’s injuries as the worst of a child that age sustained at the hands of a child of equal age with a weapon.” The attacker has since been taken into care.”

How many times do we take our young kids out in the car with a friend and then no sooner do you turn your back even just to chat at the front door of the house when there is some sort of to do about who hit who, or who injured who, or who said whatever to who.  This could have so easily happened to just about any of us. I guess the difference lies in a few basic questions:

1. Who would leave a car jack lying within reach of the children in the back of a car

2. How long were they left alone for and where?

3. How well did the parents, or the attacked child, know the attacker?

Even with the answer to all that…to think that a child of 3 could have made such a ferrocious attack on another child is horrifying.  No wonder in this case the High Court has done away with the 10 rating on being held responsible for his actions and taken the child into care. Something has got to be seriously wrong for a 3 year old to do something this bad.  It just shows though as I’ve always suspected since having kids – YOU NEED EYES IN THE BACK OF YOUR HEAD at all times.

What do you think ?  Did you read about this and what are your thoughts?

November 10, 2009

Post back to normal

Filed under: News — Tags: , , , , — Ann-Maree @ 8:28 pm

It seems at last the postal backlog is being cleared and post is arriving as normal at last. If you have any missing name tags in the post from labels4kids please hold off the 15 working days from despatch date and it should be with you by then. If it isn’t don’t worry we will rerun for you and place a trace.  Thank goodness it has all been sorted for Christmas present time!

Peer pressure and xbox Call of Duty:Modern Warfare

Well, here my husband and I are in a major dilemma.  For the past week the 11 year old with a pocket full of new birthday gaming vouchers is going On and On and On about buying Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. He has the vouchers to buy it, he has the cash to buy it, but he DOESN’T have the RIGHT AGE to buy it…

so there’s the catch.  He can’t go in himself to get it, or can he?  I would have thought that if he did try the games shops would turn him away without id. However I know friends have been in the these shops and been sold games when their other friends have been asked for id.  So how do they determine someone’s age and how does the whole rating or censorship system work in the UK?  I really don’t know for sure. I see that this game is rated for example an 18 in Europe but in Australia a 15+ for example. It’s just so confusing for parents.

I really object to him playing an 18+ game at the age of 11. However I do see his point. There’s an addiction about these games. They’re cool. They have levels to beat their friends at, you work your way up the levels, you win awards,  you swap or build weapons, you beat the bad guys, and they are so realistic.  The problem in my eyes is the violence and the language on these. 

We are not over protective parents. We let him see more than some 10 or 12 year olds. He can have the odd game over his age but we like to check them out online first. We check out the forums, the clips etc first, chat to the guys at Game, and then make an informed decision. 

I have decided there is definately a HUGE gap in the gaming market for the ages of 7-16.  There are happy comicy games for 2-7 year olds and there are violent and offensive games (albeit fun) for over 16, but more for over 18, for the real gamers out there that are adults.  But the middle range are really missing out.  Surely the gaming companies have thought of this?  Is it just that there is not enough disposable income for that age group so it is not profitable for them to buy them?  Please would a company make a cool game that’s similar to Call of Duty without the blood and guts and the language.

It’s not that kids like shooting and I certainly don’t condone that either. They like the addiction of the game.  Like Pokemon as younger kids where you work your way up the levels and have certain things to find or do to get to the next level, these games are very similar.  However they also unfortunately involve guns.  It’s the whole aiming and target shooting thing that is appealing to kids, not the killing. It’s just a shame that they are becoming so much more realistic that they are just, in my opinion, too likely to affect their sleep, their brain and their acceptable level of violence. No wonder society is going to pot!

What do you think?  Do you have a younger than 18 child and have you bought it for them anyway?  Are the UK censor ratings consistent or not? Are they reliable?  Do you give in for peace and just buy it or do you hold out and not give in to your kids wishes?  Let everyone know your thoughts!

A very frustrated mum with a headache!

Ann-Maree

November 3, 2009

Madeleine McCann Plea

Filed under: General Chit-Chat — Tags: — Ann-Maree @ 9:46 pm

Madeleine McCann is still missing and another plea was released this morning for help on the BBC breakfast news. Please if you know or are suspicious of anything you may have seen do help and report it to the police.  See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8339258.stm for a new video link.

Fraud in the school admissions process

The BBC1 10pm news report last night had an interesting report on fraud in the admissions process for schools in England.  What do you think?  Would you lie to get your child into the right school?  How important is it to you that your child is in the right school? 

It seems that some politicians are recommending that there by higher fines, even that a civil offence is introduced for parents!  The fine and the civil offence obviously are not popular with anyone but what an idea! The problem apparently is that bad.

Parents are so desperate to get their child in what they consider to be the right school that they fill in the form using:

  • rental addresses,
  • parents’s addresses,
  • other friends’ addresses,
  • fake a marriage breakdown to use another address, or even
  • use empty property addresses as a family home address.

There are 3 applications for every 1 place.

Surely punishing parents is wrong. Surely the education department should be doing their best to improve schools so that this is not as severe a problem.  A fair, honest and open system is what everyone is trying to achieve but what do you think?  Tell us your views?